
In recent years Christian theologians have attempted to explain away the existence of evil in such terms, thus God is spoken of in terms very unlike an all omnipotent being with unlimited power and unlimited benevolence. But such approaches to explaining away the problem of evil contradict both Qur'anic and alleged current Biblical statements, such as:
“He has the power to will anything” [Surah Al Hadid (57) : Ayah 3]
Even the current alleged versions of the Bible state: "with God all things are possible" [Matthew 19 : 26]
Or consider: “Allah is the Creator of all things” [Surah Ar-Ra’d (13): Ayah 16]
To limit God's power is to disbelieve in the Almighty God of Islam. The so called problem of evil can be explained without limiting God's power.
Free Choice
When God informed the angels that He was going to create a human being with the capacity of free choice they said as conveyed by the Qur'an:
“Will You place thereon one who will work corruption there and shed blood, while we proclaim Your praise and call you holy? He said: Assuredly I know which you do not know” [Surah Al-Baqarah (2): Ayah 30]
Evil arises because the world is inhabited by beings with free choice. The existence of free beings capable of making a choice over their actions demands the potential for evil. An omnipotent God is not incompatible with such a world.
God could have created a world in which there was no evil, but this could not contain beings with free choice.
To this someone may say, but if God is Almighty he can by definition do anything and therefore you can have a world with beings with free choice and no evil. Such a statement is wrong because although God is omnipotent certain things are intrinsically impossible to alter since it will question the concept of reason and rationale. For example its not possible for there to exist a four sided-triangle or a square circle. A shape that has four sides can never be a triangle. The intrinsic nature of a triangle is that it has only three sides. Applying the term triangle to a four sided object would be nonsense. Likewise, to eliminate evil God would have to create humans with no power of choice as to whether or not to do evil. It is as intrinsically impossible to have beings with free choice who have no power of choice, as it is to have a square circle.
Qadar
For a human being to have free choice he must exist in an environment with things to choose from. The environment must be stable and independent of our will, like a neutral field in which we exist rather than control. For example, wood posses a quality which enables us to use it as a wooden beam for supporting structures, this same quality, which is of its nature, also allows us to use wood to hit a cricket ball or someone’s head. If a wooden bat became as soft as jelly and it was used to strike somebody then wrong actions would be impossible, and thus there would be no free choice. To give another example, sound waves travel through air, thus if the air only permitted the sound of praising God and other good sounds to travel, there would be no free choice. If the air molecules refuse to carry harmful remarks there can be no free choice. Carried to its logical conclusion, evil thoughts would be impossible because the brain would refuse to carry out its task when put to an evil purpose. Accordingly, the existence of free choice demands that humans occupy a world where matter has a fixed nature that allows actions to be carried out with predictable results.
“Behold, everything have We created in due measure and proportion (Qadar)” [Surah Al Qamar (54): Ayah 49]
The fixed nature of matter is God given, it is termed “Qadar”. The nature of the matter does not in itself initiate action, because it is independent of our will. Moreover, the fixed nature of matter cannot be characterised as good or evil. The description of matter as good or evil is not based on the essence of the thing but on an external factor, namely, whether or not it is agreeable to the individual. But a consequence of us living in an environment independent of our will, where matter has a fixed nature and obeys constant laws, is that a state of affairs agreeable to one person may not be agreeable to another. For example, the rain which gives joy to the farmer may be the cause of an illness for the person who is homeless living on the street. Thus not all states of affair will be equally agreeable to the wishes of everyone; if a person pushing a pram is having to go down a hill, the person pushing a pram in the other direction has to go up the hill. Naturally the person pushing the pram down the hill will consider the gradient of the hill good, while the person pushing the pram up the hill will consider the gradient of the hill bad. Although it is understandable that human beings judge upon such states of affairs as good or bad it is incorrect to do so.
“But it may happen that you hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that you love a thing which is bad for you. God knows and you know not” [Surah Al-Baqarah (2): Ayah 216]
Matter is not good or evil, these terms are applied as a result of external considerations. The Muslim belief is to accept the nature of matter as it is; matter is not inherently evil or good. The terms good and evil are used to describe mans actions that are enacted with free choice. Good being those actions which accord with the divine law, and evil being those actions which violate the divine law. This is the basis for reward and punishment. Evil is therefore a direct consequence of human beings being vested with free choice. There is, therefore, no contradiction between God’s omnipotence and the existence of evil in this world.
“Whoso does right it is for his soul, and whoso does wrong it is against it. And your Lord does not wrong His creatures” [Suarh Fussilat (41): Ayah 46]
[Article written by Abdul Karim Hassan]
No comments:
Post a Comment