Many people around the world look in awe towards Israel, a nation only 60 years old, built by a
people who were persecuted for centuries and have one of the most advanced militaries in the
world. Israel has managed, from its inception, to defeat its neighbouring nations in four wars, even though its population is that of a small island. It is such realities that have led to many believing it is Israel that pulls the strings around the world even controlling US foreign policy.
What needs to be explored is who controls who and to what extent?
The close relationship between the US and Israel has been one of the most salient features in US foreign policy for nearly three and a half decades. The $3 billion in military and economic aid sent annually to Israel by Washington is rarely questioned in Congress, even by liberals who normally
challenge US aid to governments that engage in widespread violations of human rights, or by
conservatives who usually oppose foreign aid in general.
Virtually all Western countries share the United States strong support for Israel’s right to exist in peace and security. The US often stands alone with Israel at the United Nations and other international forums when objections are raised over ongoing Israeli violations of international law and related concerns.
The US took an interest in the Middle East after World War 2 when it tasted the benefits of Gulf oil and decided that it could no longer remain isolated and began manoeuvring in the region.
In 1944 the State Department described the Arabian Peninsula as constituting: ‘A stupendous source of strategic power and the greatest material prize in the world’s history.’
The United States was aware that control of the region’s oil supply was a lever to control the world. As George Kennan, the influential planner of the containment of the Soviet Union put it in 1949: ‘If the US controlled the oil, it would have veto power over the potential actions in the future of rivals like Germany and Japan’ Realising the potential of the Middle East, the US set forward multiple plans and strategies to control the region.
Israel was created on the basis of fulfilling a British interest by being placed in the middle of the
Muslim world; however British weakness after World War 2 led to the US reorganising the region.
The US looked towards Israel, within defined and secure boundaries, even though it was established with dreams of Eretz Israel (a greater Israel). This was the first difference between the US and Israel. The position of Israel is very clear since it has refused to define its borders from the very beginning. This exposed the fact that Israel was not a colony of the US and there were conflicting interests between the two.
Ever since the establishment of the Zionist movement, the Jews have been aiming to achieve
economic and political domination over the region. America rejects the idea of substituting European influence with Jewish influence, and she also rejects the idea of sharing power with any
other country. America is committed to protecting Israel, guaranteeing her security and securing a prosperous standard of living for the Jews living there. However, she refuses to allow Israel to share the influence with her. In order to prevent Israeli expansion and the spread of Israeli influence in the region, American policy has been based on isolating Israel from the rest of the region in an attempt to curtail her and minimise her role in the quest to solve the Palestinian issue and the Middle Eastern issue.
US policy is centred around establishing a Palestinian state to act as an instrument of containment; by establishing a host of international guarantees and by bringing multinational forces to be deployed along the borders between Israel and the neighbouring Arab countries - Jordan, Syria, Egypt and the future Palestinian State.
The American policy has also been based on working towards the internationalisation of Jerusalem, as America sees this internationalisation as a solution to the sensitive crisis of Jerusalem that would please the Christians and guarantee a strong American presence through the presence of the United Nations.
There are a whole host of factors which has led the US and Israeli foreign policies to reach the
extent they have today:
- Many US citizens share a sentimental attachment with Israel especially many liberals -
particularly among the post-war generation in leadership positions in government and the
media. Many Americans identify with Israel’s historical struggle, internal democracy,
relatively high standard of living and its role as a sanctuary for an oppressed minority group
that spent centuries in diaspora.
- The Christian Right in the US, with tens of millions of followers and a major base of support
for the Republican Party, historically has thrown its immense media and political clout in
support of Israel and other right-wing Israeli leaders. Based in part on a theology that sees the
ingathering of Jews to the Holy Land as a precursor for the second coming of Christ, the
battle between Israelis and Palestinians is, in their eyes, simply a continuation of the battle
between the Israelites and the Philistines, with God having deemed that the land belongs to
Israel alone.
- Mainstream and conservative Jewish organisations have mobilised considerable lobbying
resources, financial contributions from the Jewish community, and citizen pressure on the
news media and other forums of public discourse in support of the Israeli government. The
role of the pro-Israel lobby is to create a climate in line with Israeli interests and help in the
creation of a climate of intimidation among those who seek to moderate US policy, including
growing numbers of progressive Jews.
- The arms industry, contributes five times more money to congressional campaigns and
lobbying efforts than AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) and other pro-
Israel groups combined. The industry however does have a considerable stake in supporting
massive arms shipments to Israel and other Middle Eastern allies of the United States. It is far
easier for a member of Congress to challenge a $60 million arms deal to Indonesia, for
example, than the $2 billion of arms to Israel, particularly when so many congressional
districts include factories that produce such military hardware.
Israel has successfully managed to build a state and then mobilise its resources to achieve many of its long term aims. However, without Western support it is impossible to see how Israel could reach the position it is in today. Israel has however failed in its ultimate aim of establishing a state with fixed borders encompassing the lands it was supposedly promised by God and this is due only to one reason – such an aim is not in the interests of the US.
The US plans defined Israeli borders alongside a Palestinian state. The Likud party which has been the party of power for most of Israel’s history attempted to unilaterally define the borders by building settlements and expelling Muslims. However, Israel still needs the US for any final
settlement and for these reasons it has organised lobbying in the US and the world’s media in order to achieve a favourable outcome.
The endeavour to achieve Eratz Israel is complicated by the fact that the Labour party in Israel believes in giving up land for permanent defined borders. It believes this is a price worth paying for the security it needs.
Hence Israel does not control the US but has been very efficient in influencing US policy. The US
is organising the Middle East. It is the one that dictates, and on many issues the US and Israel have the same policy, however this should not been seen as the US abandoning its interests for Israel.
US support for the Israeli government, like US support for its allies elsewhere in the world, is notmotivated by objective security needs or a strong moral commitment to the country. Rather, as elsewhere, US foreign policy is motivated primarily to advance its own perceived strategic interests.
[Extracted from the book ‘Geopolitical Myths’ by Adnan Khan]
No comments:
Post a Comment