
"Our fight is with those who do not share our values and who use terror to try and force us to accept theirs. When I say values, I mean those values based on our shared humanity on our shared understanding of the rights to life, equality, justice and opportunity, the principles of devotion to family and to society, and to faith, to good works, to good deeds, to charity."
‘Equality’ here is assumed to be a value the whole of humanity undoubtedly take on, and a value as he goes onto say is synonymous with good families, society and general goodness. That is an absolution sweeping assumption, that most do not question - But what I want to pledge today, is that, please, women, do question.
Tessa Jowell, the then Culture Secreatary, commented on the veil fiasco ignited by Jack Straw by saying that veiled women were failing to take a full place in society and that ‘equality for women’ was something integral which ‘We fought generations for’. The Government have therefore been trying to lure Muslim women out of their shells, into the world of gender equality with a whole host of measures. The Muslim Women’s Advisory Group, set up by the Home Office, has been active since the July bombings, providing the Home Office with insight into the world of Muslim women and the community. This advisory group most recently launched a massive programme called, ‘Play your part – Make your mark’, to try and get more Muslim women active in British public life, from becoming school Governors to actual politicians.
Behind the mask of being active in your community, the Government is attempting to entice Muslim women to leave their unique social standing given by Islam, and adopt a value which the West have ‘fought generations for’. By using Muslim women themselves to take this call out to the community, through seemingly innocuous calls such as help your community, the Government has been able to pressure and lure Muslim women to take on roles just like men – As of course, women are drawn as when packaged like this, we all want to fulfil our potential and give our due to our communities and our children. As it is not about being involved in the community, the problem I have with the whole agenda is the sweeping assumtion that somehow the lifestyles of specifically Muslim women, needs altering, and it is the values of therefore Muslim women that need changing. Cmon we all know that a lack of political participation and activism in society is absolutely shameful within the cruxes of mainstream British societies.
Therefore we need to understand in its entirety what this ‘gender equality’ is actually about and not fall for the rosy picture painted for us all. As Tessa Jowell very nicely pointed out, the idea of ‘gender equality’ arose actually out of the hostile battle women had to undergo in the West to simply attain certain rights for themselves in this society. Women in the West were faced with the inability to vote, leave a violent husband, own property and had poor rights in education and employment. Women were seen as lesser to men, having lesser mental capacity to be active in public life. It was therefore brave women who took it upon themselves to fight these oppressive circumstances and battle against the establishment and men, attempting to grab everything men had and were entitled to. It is this battle which has evolved to today, where women still feel on the defensive, fighting to have everything and be everything men are despite the consequences; and whether this is even the right thing to actually do.
The battle for equality has meant, that women in society have lost value for who they are as women, but are constantly trying to live upto the roles of men and thus contribute to the economy – as this is set as the measure of achievement. It means that women feel in order to be valued and feel successful, they must work – Whether this be delaying a family until an age when they regret not being able to conceive, or after having children assigning their care to other than themselves in the name of trying to still feel successful. Therefore how can this idea of equality lead to the successful building of the family and therefore society, when family incessantly becomes a second class priority?
Gender equality does not appreciate, in the workplace or in the home, the innate differences of the sexes rather ignores them leaving women to suffer. As when working women do bring home an income just like their partner, they find that the equality attitude does not stretch that far when it comes to the home. The majority of the housework still needs to be fitted in by them. An Oxford University study in 2001 showed that whether a woman works or not, this has little impact on the predominant amount of housework a woman does.The fact that better flexible working conditions for mothers and better maternity rights has also been a more recent ongoing battle shows how gender neutral laws and policies have done little to actually cater for the woman. And therefore women have been forced to betray equality in its essence in calling for such policies, just in order to survive in the workplace.
Thus the reality is real gender equality does not actually exist in society. This can be shown moreso in the fact that the gender pay gap between men and women still exists despite the lengthy equality battle so far - A study by the Office for National Statistics last year, claimed that this gap had widened to 17.1%. A report by the Equal Opportunities Commission in 2004 showed that women still faced a ‘glass ceiling’ when it came to progressing to senior positions in a variety of sectors. Finally equality in no way, has guaranteed the honour of women in society – A recent Home Office report found that there were over 650,000 reported cases of domestic violence in the last year, three times more than the previous year. Clearly the current viewpoint towards women in society is not working and it is time we look towards a viewpoint and solution which will guarantee women peace and tranquility and maintain their honour.
[Extracted from article ‘Universal Gender Equality?’ by Life Before Website]
1 comment:
Reading your blog, I am conflicted. I am unable to see a reason not to fear people with your views. I don't know why I should not use every legal method of this society to prevent you from achieving your goals. In my case it is a question of survival. I am an atheist and a homosexual.
I am willing to admit that we both have absolute views. Yours are based on your interpretation of what you consider to be a holy book. Mine are based on my interpretation of the natural world without supernatural explanations and the belief that all members of our society must have equal rights. I believe this society should be structured though open argument based on rational thought and reason. Is there a way that we can coexist, or does one of us have to destroy the other?
As far as I can tell, you advocate a worldwide caliphate enforcing the observance of sharia law. This would include removing my rights to live the life I lead. I’d imagine you consider me to be under some kind of delusion, or perhaps a demonic influence. But I consider your belief in a supreme being delusional, and correct me if I’m wrong but the enforcement of the laws you consider sacred would have me executed.
I believe I am not homosexual by choice, it is who I am. I do not see this as good or evil, but as a natural trait. I can promise you, no amount of prayer would change this. My relationship with my partner of 13 years is a source of immense happiness, I am in a civil partnership sanctioned by the state of Great Britain. I consider myself blessed and lucky to live in a country that affords me this right. I have been accepted by my family and the family of my partner, we feel loved by them.
I won’t go into the voluntary work I’ve done, but suffice to say I have helped people of all beliefs and backgrounds in times of need. I act without the guidance of a higher power, but I do think my work makes the world a better place to live. I have many very close friends who are Muslim, a few of them are gay. Are my friends not good Muslims if they are accepting of my partner and me and don’t try to change me or tell that I’m going to hell?
I know that cruelty and subjugation occur in every community, by people who profess all faiths. I do not think they would end if any one set of beliefs were imposed on the world. Besides which, I am certain there never has been and will never be one set of beliefs for all people, as evidenced by the schisms that occur in every religion.
So now I have the conflict. How can I be tolerant of those who would destroy me and all those who live a life like mine? I think everyone should be able to say whatever they want, even if others consider it blasphemy. I believe you should have every right to worship your god, and you should have access to the same set of rights and protections from discrimination as every other person. But these rights should be limited if they incite murder or brutality. If I had all the political power in this country, I would not take away your rights to worship if it is your free choice. But I feel if you had all the political power, you would prevent me from living my life.
So I fail to see how your views are any different from those of the BNP, at least as far as my life is concerned. I march against the BNP because I am disgusted by racism, but also because they are opposed to my rights to live how I wish. How can I accept your right to advocate my destruction? Should I make every effort to stop your cause or can we coexist?
Post a Comment