
The protestant movement is considered the basis of fundamentalism. It set out its fundamental principles in the conference of........in 1878. And also in the general presbyterian conference of 1910 where the basic thought on which fundamentalism is established were crystallised. They were established on principles of Christian beliefs which contradicted the scientific progress arising from the capitalist ideology. Which is established on the creed of separating religion from life.
Though this movement disappeared with the second world war, however it settles in the minds of the Europeans that fundamentalism was an enemy to progress and science. It is intellectual backwardness which does not befit the age of awakening, it must be fought until all its traces/effects are removed from society and life.
Thus, fundamentalism emerged in Europe against the effect of the scientific and industrial advancement, which came after the separation of Christianity from life. As a reaction to the inability of Christianity to respond to the new systems of life which emanate from the creed of the capitalist ideology, the creed of separating religion from life. Which pushed the believers in the Christian faith to adopt a stance refusing the various forms of material progress and the capitalist culture. However this movement, described a fundamentalist, failed and disappeared due to its inability to present practical solutions for the life’s problems. And due to the aim for which it was established, which is the resistance to science, disciplines and thoughts which the Christians did not agree with or believe in.
So the source of describing certain Christian and Jewish movements as fundamentalist is the West. It is a reference to the religious movements which oppose the technical, industrial and scientific progress which took place due to the application of the capitalist ideology.
Today, this description is applied to many Islamic movement and on those who are affiliated to these movements by the western thinkers and politicians, then by Muslims conforming to this. The aim is to fight and oppose these movements by creating a international public opinion against anyone described as such, because fundamentalism for them means backwardness and reactionism. And it means opposing scientific and industrial advancement.
Merely describing a specific group as fundamentalist it is sufficient to consider it a danger to the modern materialist culture and to the lives of people.And this justifies taking necessary measures, however harsh, to struggle and fight against it. And when a state like Egypt or Algeria execute Muslims for being fundamentalists, this action is greeted with support of the western public opinion. No human right organisation is moved by it because those people -according to their claim - are fundamentalists. They are against humanity, especially when all of the ugliest acts are attributed to them such as the mass slaughter of innocent people in Algeria and the killing of tourists and Copts in Egypt.
The description of fundamentalism crossed over to include every movement and party which worked to change the terrible life which the Muslims live in to an Islamic life by restabilising the Khilafah and ruling by Islam. And it has come to include every movement which opposes aggressors and usurpers of Muslims land and their rights such as the Jews, Serbs and Americans and others. So the Muslim Mujahids who fight their enemies who are usurping their land are fundamentalist and terrorists. And those die as martyrs by striking the aggressor foreign forces is a suicidal criminal!
The description of fundamentalism is dangerous for every Muslim and every movement fighting injustice and occupation. It is dangerous to every party working according to the Shari’a methodology to resume the Islamic way of life because the objective of this description is to create legal justifications to strike anyone calling for the reestablishment of Islam in life.Under the pretext that Islam is a fundamentalist movement like Jewish and Christian fundamentalist movements which fought industrial and scientific progress in the age of the capitalist revival. The selection of this term itself is just to brand/stigmatise the Islamic movements with it .......so that the western peoples stand with their rulers in the face of the return of political Islam as a state and system of life.
It should not occur to the mind of any Muslim that the description of Islamic movements as fundamentalist is taken due to their connection with the foundation of the Deen or the foundations of jurisprudence (Fiqh). the foundation of the Islamic ‘Aqeeda is the belief in Allah, His angels, Books, Messengers, Day of Judgement and al-Qadar. And the foundations of jurisprudence are the principles on which jurisprudence is based, which the Mujtahid uses to derive practical Shari’a rules for the detailed evidences.
Fundamentalism, according to its western terminological meaning, and which the Christian protestant movement had brought with the aim for which the movement was founded, cannot be further from the Islamic concepts and the Islamic movements whether they are contemporary or historical. In Muslim history political movements, intellectual schools and legal schools have appeared. However they do not resemble the Christian fundamentalist movements in any way whatsoever. Even thus who called for the closing of the door of Ijtihad in the seventh century did so not to preserve the old and oppose the new. Rather because they thought that the Islamic Fiqh initiated by the predecessors (salaf) contained all the issues that the later scholars (khalaf) could possible face.
Islam is a unique Deen which differs from the divine religions in that it is the last and it abrogates the ones that came before. Allah (swt) has taken the responsibility of preserving it as it was revealed until the Day of Judgement. He (swt) said:’Verily We:It is We Who have sent down the Zikr (Qur’an) and surely, We will guard it’.[Surah Al Hijr (15): Ayah 9] As for it being a complete and comprehensive ideology which is established on a creed which is based on the mind, from which emanates a comprehensive system which solves all the affairs of the human being until the Day of Judgement. It cannot be imagined that the ideology is unable to give a Shari’a rule to any problem faced by man. He (swt) said: ’And We have sent down to you the Book (the Qur’an) as an exposition of everything’. [Surah An Nahl (16): Ayah 89]
The scientific and industrial progress which the Islamic world witnessed in the past was a result of the application of Islam and not a result of separating Islam from life.And the scientific and industrial advancement which the world is witnessing today is indebted to the Muslim scholars who set out many of its theories and basic laws in the shadow of the Islamic life and the Islamic State.
Therefore, describing Islam and the Islamic movements a fundamentalist, which which the Christian movements were described, is a erroneous and biased description. It does not apply to the reality of Islam and nor on anyone who works for the return of Islam to,life. This is because he is striving to change the bad reality in which the Muslims are living. That reality resulting from the rule of man-made systems in life. This is the opposite to the work of the Christian fundamentalist movements which came to preserve the reality in which the Christians lived before capitalism, in form and content.
So America and Europe’s description of the Islamic movements as being fundamentalist is nothing but a war against Islam’s return to life. It is a strategic issue, even a vital issue for the West. They are intent on keeping the third world, especially the Islamic world, backward and far from any true revival. So as to stand as an obstacle to the reestablishment of the Khilafah State which will uproot their system and put an end to their ambitions and greed.
Listen to the testimony of one of these people; he is a visiting scholar at the university of Harvard for middle eastern studies. He submitted a report to the American Congress in which he said: Fundamentalists take the view that the Shari’a should be applied in all its details and that the orders and prohibitions of God must be implemented completely. And that is binding on all Muslims. And it -ie Islam- is the basic source of their strength and the Shari’a is suitable for application today as it was suitable for application in the past.’ Also said: ‘Fundamentalists deeply hate the Western civilisation, they see it as the greatest obstacle which stand in the face of the application of the Islamic Law’. Another says, and he is an American scholar called Esposito, in a report submitted by him also to the American Congress: Those who threaten American interests are the Muslim fundamentalists’.
So the fundamentalism which they attack is the reapplication of the Islamic Shari’a in life. If this is fundamentalism them the Muslims - in their view- are all fundamentalists. This is because they wait with yearning and zeal, for the application of all the rules of their Deen, under the shadow of the Khilafah State, to save them and the world from the misery of capitalism and take them to the goodness of Islam. He (swt) said: "And who does more wrong than the one who invents a lie against Allah, while he is being invited to Islam? And Allah guides not the people who are unjust (zalimoon).They intend to put out the Light of Allah (Islam) with their mouths. But Allah will complete His Light even though the disbelievers hate it".[Surah As Saff (61): Ayat 7-8]
[Extracted from the book ‘Dangerous Concepts]
No comments:
Post a Comment