About this blog

In recent times a plethora of misconceptions, misrepresentation and myths have been forged about Islam
and Muslims. Many western influentials from politicians, policymakers to judges have taken it upon
themselves to undermine the Islamic beliefs, values and rules so to make it palatable to their
egotistic minds and the secular liberal thoughts.


This blog is dedicated:-

1. To argue the point for Islam in its belief and systems and to refute the misconceptions.
2. To expose the weakness and contradictions of all forms of secularism.


16 May 2011

The Bin Laden Wedge

My phone ran hot last week with calls from media. After giving numerous interviews to TV, radio, and print media, there was a discernable pattern as to what journalists were after.

In putting together their about ‘local Muslim reaction’ to the death of Osama bin Laden, they were looking for ‘personal’ views about the man, his life and legacy – code for views that were any different to the mainstream view, which could then be sensationalised in a bid to increase ratings or sell papers – objectives that have, regrettably, become the mainstream media’s raison d’ĂȘtre.

Coverage of the whole matter was therefore predictable: Osama bin Laden, evil incarnate on Earth, had been killed, and the world was celebrating. But...the fantastical media narrative would have us believe that Muslims around the world, to the shock and horror of all fair-minded people, were not. They were privately grieving, they supported the man, and in turn they supported terrorism. In sum, they are a violent and barbaric people who follow a deranged ideology....

The reality of what most Muslims thought was, of course, far more nuanced and, dare I say it, reasonable. On our part, we had issued a statement on the killing of bin Laden in which we highlighted the substantive points on the matter.

One, Western Governments have committed far greater acts of terrorism than any individual. Two, the issue is not the person of bin Laden but the context of his struggle being a struggle of resistance against Western imperialism in the Muslim World – a resistance which Muslims globally relate to. Third, the killing of bin Laden was no real victory, it would make little difference on the ground, and the ‘War on Terror’, on the whole, was in fact a resounding failure.

These assertions confounded, apparently, most of the journalists.

They could not understand how the American government or the Australian government could be called terrorists. Perhaps the suits, boots and ties (and oval offices) blind them to the hundreds of thousands of innocent people killed in Iraq on the basis of a blatant lie? Or the terror inflicted upon Afghanistan under pretexts that by now have changed multiple times and become mutually contradictory? Or the decades of support for brutal tyrants who the people of the Muslim World are now paying the highest price - their blood - to remove?

They also found it hard to believe that the death of bin Laden was not a significant victory. Yet Australian officials, current and former, had already gone out of the way to qualify the alleged significance of the event with its being of ‘symbolic’ value, and most analysts made it clear that the death makes little difference operationally on the ground. This did not stop Australian officials from ‘welcoming’ the death, or Americans vociferously celebrating the death, in a way even the deaths of Hitler, Hirohito and Mao Tse Tung were not celebrated. Go figure.

The reality, sour as it may be for some, is that the ill-thought war waged on a common noun has only made things worse. After a long and arduous decade, the ‘War on Terror’ has seen trillions of dollars spent (at a time when most economies around the world are doing it tough), thousands of soldiers lost, the lives and livelihoods of millions of innocent people destroyed, and who honestly believes that the world is a safer place because of it?

Further, what moral legitimacy does an endeavour which undermines the very objectives it allegedly seeks, have?

The American administration has shown once again, in the method in which they killed bin Laden – effectively an extrajudicial assassination – that they are more than willing to sacrifice due process, rule of law, the sovereignty of another nation and like ‘values’ that they are purportedly fighting for at the altar of political expediency.

Thus, there is no real victory. Except, perhaps, for President Obama’s political career, and for Hollywood screenwriters, who are provided with plenty of source-material by the White House and their botched narrativeof how bin Laden was killed.

As for the source of the greatest consternation, journalists could not understand how Muslims could condone the targeting of innocent people. Of course, Muslims did not support any such thing. Islam does not condone the targeting of innocent people and is clear in its definitive prohibition of this. The thought otherwise was the result of a fallacious but attractive logic that equates support for a person generally to support for actions attributed to him specifically.

This would be like equating support for Ned Kelly to support for the cold-blooded murder and highway robberies attributed to him. Yet many Australians see him as a folk hero. Should we presume that these people are heartless individuals who support murder and theft?

Similarly, should support for the Allied war effort in WWII be taken to also represent explicit support for the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki or any of the other atrocities committed by Allied forces in WWII?

The fallacy in this sort of thinking is that it de-contextualises events. It ignores the fact that for those who support Ned Kelly, he represented the Irish-Australian resistance to the oppression of the British colonial ruling class of his time. It ignores the fact that the Allies were fighting the excesses of the Germans and Japanese in WWII. Likewise, it ignores the fact that bin Laden was resisting Western imperialism in the Muslim world, which is where the real discussion should be.

Once the context is kept as the backdrop, it is quite easy to see why Osama bin Laden has widespread support and sympathy from Muslims throughout the world. It is because he stood to defend the Muslim nation from one of the fronts of Western attack – the military one – and sacrificed everything in doing so.

The other fronts – economic, cultural, ideological, and political – are engaged by millions of Muslims from all over the world, and thus the connection and relation should be obvious: the main aggressor is the same (Western powers), the motivation is the same (fulfilling the Islamic obligation of defence), as is the objective (to liberate the Muslim World from foreign subjugation).

It can be difficult at time to make these connections, given the distortions propagated. Western powers claim their struggle is not against Islam, but certain ‘militant’ interpretations of Islam (as if they are qualified to be able to discern right interpretations from wrong ones). The reality, which Muslims globally appreciate, is that their fight is against Islam itself. It is, in particular, against the manifestation of Islam as a political force, whereas they desire to see it relegated to being a spiritual force alone, akin to modern day Christianity. As such, the war is being fought on the economic, cultural, ideological, and political fronts as much as it is being fought on the military front.

This has been the case from long before bin Laden and will continue long after him.

The struggle is far greater than any one individual, group, or nation. Particularising the discussion around individuals and turning a blind eye to the broader context is what creates a wedge of misunderstanding about what others think. In turn, it increases the wedge of fear, apprehension and distrust of the other side. Worse still, the problem is exacerbated as we move further away from understanding the causes and, in turn, the correct solutions.

Media and government are adamant to continue having this debate around personalities, caricatures and fantastical narratives.

Government, because it helps in perpetuating a fear on the back of which they can continue their exploitation of weaker nations abroad.

Media, because that’s what sells, and they have lost all sense of social responsibility.

For all those honestly concerned about the progress of humanity however, the debate needs to move to the substantive issues of the root-causes of terrorism and Western foreign policy, the single biggest factor responsible for much of the unrest around the world.

[source: Uthman Bader - http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/2610318.html]

No comments:

What they said...

“Islam represented the greatest military power on earth…It was the foremost economic power in the world…It had achieved the highest level so far in human history, in the arts and sciences of civilization...Islam in contrast created a world civilization, poly-ethnic, multiracial, international, one might even say intercontinental.”





[Bernard Lewis, Professor of Near Eastern Studies, Orientalist and Historian, 2001]





"There was once a civilization that was the greatest in the world. It was able to create a continental super-state that stretched from ocean to ocean, and from northern climes to tropics and deserts…the civilization I'm talking about was the Islamic world from the year 800 to 1600… Although we are often unaware of our indebtedness to this other civilization, its gifts are very much a part of our heritage"





[Carly Fiorina, ex-CEO of Hewlett-Packard, 2001]





"For the first three centuries of its existence (circ. A.D 650-1000) the realm of Islam was the most civilized and progressive portion of the world. Studded with splendid cities, gracious mosques and quiet universities where the wisdom of the ancient world was preserved and appreciated, the Moslem world offered a striking contrast to the Christian West, then sunk in the night of the Dark Ages."





[Lothrop Stoddard, Ph.D (Harvard), American political theorist and historian, 1932]





"Medieval Islam was technologically advanced and open to innovation. It achieved far higher literacy rates than in contemporary Europe;it assimilated the legacy of classical Greek civilization to such a degree that many classical books are now known to us only through Arabic copies. It invented windmills ,trigonometry, lateen sails and made major advances in metallurgy, mechanical and chemical engineering and irrigation methods. In the middle-ages the flow of technology was overwhelmingly from Islam to Europe rather from Europe to Islam. Only after the 1500's did the net direction of flow begin to reverse."





[Jared Diamond, UCLA sociologist and Author, 1997]



"No other society has such a record of success in uniting in an equality of status, of opportunity and endeavour so many and so varied races of mankind. The great Muslim communities of Africa, India and Indonesia, perhaps also the small community in Japan, show that Islam has still the power to reconcile apparently irreconcilable elements of race and tradition. If ever the opposition of the great societies of the East and west is to be replaced by cooperation, the mediation of Islam is an indispensable condition."





[Hamilton Alexander Rosskeen Gibb, Professor at Harvard University, 1932]





“The Muhammadan Law which is binding on all -- from the crowned head to the meanest subject is a law interwoven with a system of the wisest, the most learned and the most enlightened jurisprudence that ever existed in the world.”





[Edmund Burke, British Statesman and Philosopher, 1789]





"The Exile here is not like in our homeland. The Turks hold respectable Jews in esteem. Here and in Alexandria, Egypt, Jews are the chief officers and administrators of the customs, and the king’s revenues. No injuries are perpetuated against them in all the empire. Only this year, in consequence of the extraordinary expenditure caused by the war against Shah Tahmsap al-Sufi, were the Jews required to make advances of loans to the princes."





[David dei Rossi, Jewish Traveller 17CE, quoted by Norman A. Stillman, The Jews of Arab Lands]





"The notable religious tolerance towards Christians and Jew under Muslim rule had given way to the uncompromising zealotry of Spanish Inquisition. Jews and Muslims thus fled Spain with large numbers of Jews immigrating to the Ottoman Empire which was known for its tolerance to the Jews."





[Graham Fuller, Author and former CIA, 1995]





“If there is much misunderstanding in the West about the nature of Islam, there is also much ignorance about the debt our own culture and civilization owe to the Islamic world. It is a failure, which stems, I think, from the straightjacket of history, which we have inherited. The medieval Islamic world, from central Asia to the shores of the Atlantic, was a world where scholars and men of learning flourished. But because we have tended to see Islam as the enemy of the West, as an alien culture, society, and systems of beliefs, we have tended to ignore or erase its great relevance to our own history”





[Charles Philip Arthur George, HRH The Prince of Wales, 1993]





"...Not being subject to the Sharia, Jews and Christians were free to go to their own religious authorities for adjudication of disputes; but in many cases they went instead to the [Muslim] Qadi"





[Richard W. Bulliet, Professor of History and Author, 2004]





"Here in the land of the Turks we have nothing to complain of. We possess great fortunes; much gold and silver are in our hands. We are not oppressed by heavy taxes and our commerce is free and unhindered. Rich are the fruits of the earth. Everything is cheap and each one of us lives in freedom. Here a Jew is not compelled to wear a yellow star as a badge of shame as is the case in Germany where even wealth and great fortune is a curse for a Jew because he therewith arouses jealousy among the Christians and they devise all kinds of slander against him to rob him of his gold. Arise my brethren, gird up your loins, collect up your forces and come to us."





[In his book 'Constantinople', Philip Mansel quotes a rabbi in Turkey writing to his brethren in Europe where they were facing increasing persecution after 1453]





"Praise be to the beneficent God for his mercy towards me! Kings of the earth, to whom his [the Caliph’s] magnificence and power are known, bring gifts to him, conciliating his favour by costly presents, such as the king of the Germans, the king of the Gebalim, the king of Constantinople, and others. All their gifts pass through my hands, and I am charged with making gifts in return. (Let my lips express praise to the God in heaven who so far extends his loving kindness towards me without any merit of my own, but in the fullness of his mercies.) I always ask the ambassadors of these monarchs about our brethren the Jews, the remnant of the captivity, whether they have heard anything concerning the deliverance of those who have pined in bondage and had found no rest."





[Hasdai Ibn Shaprut (915-990 CE) Jewish physician, chief minister of Islamic Caliphate in Cordova, 'The Jewish Caravan']





"In Baghdad there are about forty thousand Jews, and they dwell in security, prosperity, and honour under the great Caliph [al-Mustanjid, 1160-70 CE], and amongst them are great sages, the Heads of the Academies engaged in the study of the Law…’"





[Benjamin of Tudela, Rabbi in Baghdad in the year 1168 CE, 'The Jew in the Medieval World']





"Those Eastern thinkers of the ninth century laid down, on the basis of their theology, the principle of the Rights of Man, in those very terms, comprehending the rights of individual liberty, and of inviolability of person and property; described the supreme power in Islam, or Califate, as based on a contract, implying conditions of capacity and performance, and subject to cancellation if the conditions under the contract were not fulfilled; elaborated a Law of War of which the humane, chivalrous prescriptions would have put to the blush certain belligerents in the Great War; expounded a doctrine of toleration of non-Moslem creeds so liberal that our West had to wait a thousand years before seeing equivalent principles adopted.





[Leon Ostorog, French Jurist]





"The debt of our science to that of the Arabs does not consist in startling discoveries or revolutionary theories; science owes a great deal more to Arab culture, it owes its existence"





[Robert Briffault, Novelist and Historian, 1928]





"The only effective link between the old and the new science is afforded by the Arabs. The dark ages come as an utter gap in the scientific history of Europe, and for more than a thousand years there was not a scientific man of note except in Arabia"





[Oliver Joseph Lodge, Writer and Professor of Physics, 1893]





“Thus, when Muslims crossed the straits of Gibraltar from North Africa in 711 and invaded the Iberian Peninsula, Jews welcomed them as liberators from Christian Persecution.”





[Zion Zohar, Jewish scholar at Florida International University, 2005]







“Throughout much of the period in question, Arabic served as the global language of scholarship, and learned men of all stripes could travel widely and hold serious and nuanced discussions in this lingua franca. Medieval Western scholars who wanted access to the latest findings also needed to master the Arabic Tongue or work from translations by those who had done so.”





[Jonathan Lyons, Author, Writer and Lecturer, 2009]