
This can be suitably illustrated by the contracts that we engage in. Let us consider the contract of trading, the contract of marriage and the contract of Khilafah. All three contracts require offer and acceptance. In the case of trading, there is an offer and acceptance from those who buy and those who sell. The benefit for those who sell is the recompense, while the benefit for those who buy is the good or service itself. In the case of marriage, there is an offer and acceptance between the man and woman. The benefit for both man and woman is the physical and emotional fulfilment which results from marriage. In the case of Khilafah, there is an offer from the Ummah and acceptance from the man who will become Khaleefah. The benefit is the complete implementation of Islam, and the ensuing justice.
We find all Muslims rigorously engaging in the contract of trading, even though this contract carries the verdict of mubah i.e. it is allowed. Allah(swt) has left the choice to us whether we engage in it or not. We also find most Muslims spending their effort looking for marriage partners and thus engaging in the marriage contract, even though this contract carries the verdict of mandub i.e we are rewarded for engaging in this contract, but not sinful if we don't. In both examples, there are tangible benefits for the individual.
However, the contract of Khilafah is fard, which means that all Muslims should have this contract on their neck - or be actively seeking to establish the Khilafah so that they can engage in the contract. But to establish this contract requires us to expend effort to change the ideas of other people for no perceived physical benefit compared to the other two. The real benefits of Khilafah in terms of sanctity of life and protection of our values is weighed up against our rational perception of whether we can achieve it or not. Hence the priority attached to this is low, to the point of non-existence. From the viewpoint of verdict, we should be expending as much effort on the Khilafah contract, for it is obligatory for the whole Ummah to be engaged in this contract. Yet, the priority we see is that some Muslims engage in those contracts that are either mubah or mandub and negligent of the contract that is fard.
All this emanates from the concept of individualism where we attach priority on those actions that we can achieve and where there is a tangible benefit. Thus individualism induces people to perform those actions that they can perform easily and where there is benefit to the individual. From this, we can see the origin of the concept of correcting oneself before correcting others. In origin, the concept is not from Islam, for we are obliged to abide by the obligations from Islam, whether that requires a corrective action on ourselves, or on others.
Unfortunately, the concept is pushed by sincere Muslims because they hold the concept of individualism and then interpret Islam accordingly. Thus, hadith related to the individuals actions are quoted to amplify the correction of oneself, while those that amplify correction of society are relegated to low importance because those hadith may require too much effort.
A classic example of this is the hadith that states: 'None of you believe until you wish for your brother what you wish for yourselves' [Muslim]
This hadith is normally narrated to help our Muslim brothers and sisters who are needy of money and food. It is used often to encourage Muslims to donate for the Muslims of Bosnia. Yet, why is the interpretation limited to food and money. Why not wish for our brothers in Bosnia sanctity of life and honour? This would require not only donation of money and food, but actions to physically change their situation, either by Jihad, or through the establishment of an Islamic State, the Khilafah. Yet we find that these two issues are not recognised as an interpretation of the hadith, because the hadith is interpreted from an individualistic viewpoint. This will by definition limit the vision to change to donation of food and money.
As Muslims, it is our responsibility to evaluate all our actions from the viewpoint of fard and haram and fulfill the requirements of each, independent of its benefit or effort required.
[Article taken from Barts & Royal London Islamic Society]
No comments:
Post a Comment