The proposition upon which these values are based on - in other words, the premise for Liberalism’s core political values - is atomism or individualism. Political Philosopher Marilyn Friedman adds that, “…individualism…underlies some important versions of liberal political theory.”
Individualism is the consideration that individual human beings are social atoms abstracted from their social contexts, attachments and obligations. In light of this, is individualism a correct premise to base a political outlook or philosophy? If it can be shown that individualism is ontologically false, this should raise fundamental questions about the validity of Liberalism as a suitable ideology for humanity.
Individualism views, and seeks to understand, the self - in other words the human being - as an abstract entity divorced from its social reality. This is incorrect because:
1. There are social and communal attachments which determine the individual.
2. Aims and values must be considered when determining the individual, and aims and values can only be truly understood within a social context.
3. There are dynamic links between society’s values and behaviour. Social Constructionist Vivien Burr concludes that key features – or values – of a specific society will affect an individual’s personality.
It can be concluded that the premise of Liberalism – individualism – is a false one. As its attempt to understand the individual or the self is incorrect. Its effort to comprehend the human being is false as it seeks to dissociate the self from its social reality, in other words, it argues that the individual is shaped, influenced and developed without any reference to social links. It logically follows that if an entire political outlook is based upon a false premise, its results will also be incorrect.
Practical Perspective Non-Cohesive Political Values
Liberalism’s political values of individual freedom and the primacy of individual rights, based upon the false premise of individualism, are non-cohesive. What is meant by non-cohesive is that these values do not facilitate social cohesion and do not evoke ideas that construct positive behaviours.
Since modern liberal states emphasise and propagate these values within western societies, their effects must be examined. If social breakdown is on the increase and it seems to be a permanent feature of liberal society, then it can be argued that the propagated non-cohesive values have had a role to play.
Practical Perspective: The Negative Effects of Liberal Values
The political values of liberalism have caused the social decay being witnessed today. In February 2009 the Children’s Society launched ‘A Good Childhood: Searching for Values in a Competitive Age’report and it presented evidence that supports this essays thesis. The reports states, “Britain and the U.S. have more broken families than other countries, and our families are less cohesive in the way they live and eat together. British children are rougher with each other, and live more riskily in terms of alcohol, drugs and teenage pregnancy. And they are less inclined to stay in education. This comes against a background of much greater income inequality: many more children live in relative poverty in Britain and the U.S.”
The report also supports this article's conclusions that social breakdown and decay is due to the premise of liberalism – individualism.
Individualism has affected our societies in an immense way, below are some statistical accounts of social breakdown in the two most liberal nations, the UK and US. There is a plethora of statistics that strongly indicated social decay in these countries however I have specifically chosen child abuse, the treatment of women and crime to bring to light the conclusion that the UK and US are experiencing social breakdown.
Child Abuse
The atomistic trends in modern liberal societies have effected the treatment towards the most vulnerable. The seventeen months of torture and agony inflicted on ‘Baby P’ is probably one of the worst stories of child abuse in the UK. The baby was found dead after months of torture with broken ribs and a broken back. In the UK, according to NSPCC research, 7% of children experienced serious physical abuse at the hands of their parents or carers during childhood. In the US an estimated 3.6 million children were accepted by state and local child protection services as alleged victims of child maltreatment for investigation or assessment.
Treatment of Women
Liberalism’s political values have affected the way UK society treats women. According to Amnesty International (UK), 167 women are raped everyday in the UK. Domestic violence accounts for nearly a quarter of all recorded violent crime in England and Wales - one in four women will be a victim of domestic violence in their lifetime and one incident of domestic violence is reported to the police every minute The UK is not alone in its maltreatment of women, in the US a woman is raped every 6 minutes and battered every 15 seconds.
Crime: UK
The effect of Liberalism’s non-cohesive values can also be seen in the following U.K. crime figures,
2,164,000 violent incidents during 2007/08 against adults in England and Wales
Approximately 47,000 rapes occur every year in the U.K.Increase in murder rates.
Metropolitan Police reported the most incidents, with 167 murders in 2007/8, up from 158.
Crime: US
The US is also suffering from social breakdown and social decay, the US suffers from,
16,204 murders a year9,369 murders with firearms in one year2,019,234 prisoners and this has increased since 2002420,637 robberies per year11,877,218 total crimes per year
It can be seen that the UK and US are suffering from social breakdown and social decay. The social collapse of the two most liberal nations is due to their ideological convictions – liberalism. There is a direct correlation between Liberalism’s non-cohesive political values and the social problems highlighted in this article.
[Article adapted from the forthcoming book 'Liberalism and its Effect on Society: Philosophical, Practical and Islamic Perspectives’ by Hamza Andreas Tzortzis]
No comments:
Post a Comment